|
Using GPS to
measure earthquakes
|

GPS is being used by scientists to study
the ongoing deformation of the crust in Southern California caused
by the San Andreas fault and other faults in the LA Basin. The
Southern California Integrated GPS Network (SCIGN) measures the
millimeter-scale movements of the crust between earthquakes, and
also records displacement of stations during earthquakes, but it
does not measure the actual shaking of the ground caused by an
earthquake.
As you learned in previous sections,
earthquakes can be measured in a variety of ways. Traditionally,
earthquake size has been determined by various seismologic methods,
which examine the amount of shaking, which directly relates to the
energy released in an earthquake.
GPS measures the size of an earthquake by
examining the final amount that a station has been displaced in an
event. This is done by examining the total distance that a station
has moved in an earthquake by comparing its position prior to the
event with its position following the event.
Scientists have found that there is a
relationship between the amount of displacement caused by an
earthquake and its magnitude. It is by using this relationship
between slip and magnitude that scientists can measure the relative
size of an earthquake using GPS.
GPS is not used to measure the actual
shaking of the ground because of the way in which the actual data
are collected. Data are sampled at a certain rate, called a sample
rate, which means that the receiver records the information being
sent to it from the satellites at a certain interval of time all day
long.
For example, data can be sampled at a
30-second interval, which means that the receiver records
information from the satellite every 30 seconds. That means that if
the shaking from the earthquake lasts any less than 30 seconds, it
will be missed by the receiver.

Because of this, data are processed and a
daily solution is determined, which means that the change in
position of the receiver is calculated for one day at a time by
combining the data collected througout the day. The data can also be
processed at another solution interval. For example, data could be
sampled at a 1-second rate and processed, but the solutions would be
far less accurate than the daily solutions.
This is the reason why GPS is not used to
directly measure the ground shaking during an earthquake.
Seismometers are much better equipped to accurately record that sort
of high-freqency motion than GPS. So, earthquake size is determined
instead by measuring the final displacement of the stations and
using the slip versus magnitude relationship.
|